Multiple Fake news claims-: A piece of information shared by many on social media claiming the dark side of Islam and India.

Surprised at what AIMIM’s Waris Pathan said about 15 crore Muslims ‘dominating’ 100 crore Hindus?

Well, don’t. The indefatigable Dr Ambedkar said this long ago, ‘Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin’. pic.twitter.com/fSRqfvQy6g

— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) February 20, 2020

Have you read the book “Pakistan or Partition of India” by Dr B.R.Ambedkar?

Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. —BR Ambedkar

Will you get Ambedkar erased too like you want to have @anusthana booked?

Have you read book “Pakistan or Partition of India” by Dr B.R.Ambedkar?

Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. —BR Ambedkar

Will you get Ambedkar erased too like you want to have @anusthana booked? https://t.co/eDdvhRZfgZ

— Aabhas Maldahiyar | Hindu 🇮🇳 (@Aabhas24) November 15, 2019

“Islam will never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland & regard a Hindu as his kith & kin.”—BR Ambedkar, Pakistan or Partition of India

You are indeed proving Ambedkar right.

“Islam will never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland & regard a Hindu as his kith & kin.”—BR Ambedkar, Pakistan or Partition of India

You are indeed proving Ambedkar right. https://t.co/hEjNOhcUe6 pic.twitter.com/vsh2PL4LO2

— Aabhas Maldahiyar | Hindu 🇮🇳 (@Aabhas24) October 21, 2019

Facts Check Verdict: True

News Verification: Yes this was words of BR Ambedkar in his book, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin" - B.R. Ambedkar, 1945 (Pakistan or the Partition of India, Ch.XII Part.V

As mentioned here, He further says, There are other defects in Hinduism and in Islam which are responsible for keeping the sore between Hindus and Muslims open and running. Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. The second defect of Islam is that it is a system of social self-government and is incompatible with local self-government, because the allegiance of a Muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. To the Muslim ibi bene ibi patria is unthinkable. Wherever there is the rule of Islam, there is his own country. In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India.

BR Ambedkar converted to Buddhism at the end of his life, for most of the time he was a Hindu. He supported secularism.